Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:31

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Can you share summer photos? Day 8
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Brain Fatigue: How the Mind Decides When to Push or Quit - Neuroscience News
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Aston Martin announce Stroll to miss Spanish Grand Prix - F1
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
How or what is the best way to make a hot rail device? Anddd goooo 👀👀
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Has anyone ever had sex with their cousin? How did it start, and would you do it again?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
7 Anti-Inflammatory Fats You Should Be Eating, According to a Dietitian - EatingWell